Most tools score everything. We screen out 95% and dig into what survives.

What this actually is

Every screener on the internet will rank twenty thousand companies on any metric you like. That is not the hard part and it is not useful: a ranked list of twenty thousand names is a list of twenty thousand names. The hard part is throwing almost all of them away and then spending a week on the handful left.

Filters. Thirty criteria from Graham, Buffett and Lynch run across the whole universe — price against earnings and book, debt, returns on capital, margins, insider ownership, dilution, how simple the story is. Most companies fail several. That rejection is the output.

Thirty criteria. The survivors are scored on the full Graham, Buffett and Lynch scorecard — ten criteria each, weighted one, two and three — and get a first-draft intrinsic value. That draft is not the answer; it is what the deep work is later checked against.

Valuation range. Several discounted-cash-flow models triangulated against each other, then a Monte Carlo simulation that re-runs the whole thing thousands of times with the assumptions drawn from distributions. The output is a range and a shape, never a single price.

Deep evaluation. What survives the range gets read: the filings, the segment notes, the cash-flow statement line by line, the compensation section. Each report ends with a thesis in one sentence and the list of things that would prove it wrong — written before the verdict, not after. This is the slow step, and the reason the four before it exist.

Read the quarterly yourself. Optional, and strongly recommended. Open the latest filing and read it before you act on anything here. A score is a summary, and a summary is not understanding: the point of the exercise is to own a business you can follow. If the industry still makes no sense to you after a quarter of reading, that is an answer too — it is not your company, whatever the score says.

Why a few hundred names and not twenty thousand

Because one person can only read so much, and reading is the method. Every company here was picked up for a reason, scored on the same thirty criteria, and re-scored when the filings moved. A universe you can hold in your head is worth more than one you can only sort. If a company you care about is missing, its page will say so, and why.

Free, and later paid

Free, permanently: the universe with verdicts and score bands, the one-sentence thesis, the key risks, what would change the verdict, the shape of the valuation range, the first chapter of every deep report, the methodology, and the twelve-month record. Five companies a week have everything opened; one a week has the entire method shown end to end.

Paid, later: the exact score behind the band, the intrinsic-value estimate and margin of safety, the simulated probabilities and percentiles, the valuation assumptions, and the rest of each deep report on the day it is written.

About the track record

There isn’t one worth the name yet. Every verdict is dated and stored, and the twelve-month record is published in full — and it shows no demonstrated edge over the universe it was drawn from, on a horizon far too short to prove anything either way. That is on the track-record page, in those words, and it stays there until the data says otherwise.