Skip to content

Hong Kong Stock Exchange (HKEX) · Consumer Defensive

Shanghai Chicmax Cosmetic Co., Ltd. Class H 2145

MonitorScore band: 50–60

Last evaluation
2026-09-06
Deep report
2026-08-28 (translated from Romanian)

The thesis, in one sentence

A short-video traffic machine rather than a brand: the flagship line is most of revenue and shrank sharply in the first half, collapsing operating margin against a fixed-cost base that had just been enlarged.

Written for this site in plain English, without figures. The arithmetic is in the full report.

The thesis is from the deep report of 2026-08-28; the verdict badge reflects the latest scoring of 2026-09-06.

Key risks

  • Flagship brand shrinking and operating leverage working in reverse
  • Platform traffic economics may have reset structurally, not cyclically
  • Price to book means you are paying for future flows, not assets

What would change the verdict

  • Gross margin falls for two consecutive quarters, showing discounting has begun
  • Revenue keeps contracting for two consecutive quarters
  • Operating margin fails to recover for two consecutive quarters
  • Days sales outstanding rise, ending the prepayment model

Read it yourself

Step five of the method is the reader's: open the latest annual or quarterly report and read it before acting on anything here. A score is a summary, and a summary is not understanding.

Filings at HKEXnews →

This exchange has no stable per-company address, so the link opens the disclosure portal — search there for the ticker.

The deep report was written against the filings available on 2026-08-28; anything published since is not in it.

Price, one year

up daydown day

Daily bars for the last year, drawn relative to the latest close, with no price axis. The shape of the year, not a price.

DCF valuation range

range of the DCF modelsbase casetoday's price

Valuation range, shape only. Figures in the full version.

Monte Carlo outcome shape

scenarios below today's pricescenarios above today's pricetoday's price

Distribution of simulated outcomes around today's price. Bar heights only; the scale and the percentiles are in the full version.

Where the money goes

22.8BRevenue5.99BCost of revenue16.8BGross profit · 74%13.8BOperating expenses3.05BOperating income · 13%558MOther & tax2.49BNet income · 11%

Last four reported quarters, 2022-12 → 2025-12, in CNY. Filings data as gathered on 2026-08-28. Figures rounded to three significant digits.

Chapter one: Executive summary

Deep-value: 2145.HK — Shanghai Chicmax Cosmetic Co., Ltd.

Deep-value analysis, 28 August 2026. Reference price: HKD … (28.08.2026 close, yfinance). Market cap: HKD 9,200 mn ≈ CNY 7,874 mn. Reporting currency CNY, trading currency HKD; rate … = 0.8558 CNY (yfinance HKDCNY=X, 28.08.2026). All financial figures are in CNY millions unless otherwise noted.

Primary sources: the H1 2026 interim results announcement (HKEXnews, 27.08.2026, 2026082701717.pdf), the 2025 Annual Report (HKEXnews, 16.04.2026, 2026041602138.pdf), the 2025 annual results announcement (26.03.2026), the profit warning (17.08.2026), the announcement of the 29% Shanghai Yiye acquisition (11.08.2026), F10 Eastmoney for semiannual series, yfinance for price/FX/peer multiples. The company is not SEC-registered — EDGAR was intentionally skipped; the bare symbol "2145" resolves on Yahoo to the wrong company ("Datalinks Corp"), which is why the alias 2145 → 2145.HK was added to deep_data_pack.py and the data pack regenerated.


Executive summary

The thesis, briefly. Chicmax is a Chinese multi-brand cosmetics company that, between 2022 and 2025, grew revenue 3.4x (2,675 → 9,178 mn CNY) on the back of a single brand — KANS — and a single channel — Douyin. In H1 2026 the engine stopped: KANS fell 20.4% (3,344.0 → 2,661.4 mn), group revenue fell 8.6% (4,108.0 → 3,756.5 mn), and attributable profit collapsed 79.4% (524.2 → 108.2 mn). The stock lost ~77% from its 52-week high of HKD 102.3 (intraday) and trades today at HKD ….

What actually broke. Not the gross margin — that actually rose, from 75.5% to 76.7%. Operating leverage broke. Marketing and promotion expense was practically flat (2,084.7 vs. 2,069.1 mn, …), but staff cost exploded 41.6% (353.0 → 499.9 mn), R&D 36.4% (103.1 → 140.6 mn), and PP&E depreciation 142.7% (44.2 → 107.3 mn), as new factories and the new headquarters came online. With falling revenue and a fixed-cost base up ~200 mn CNY per half-year, the operating margin fell from 16.2% to 4.4%. The return on marketing spend (revenue/marketing) fell from 1.99x to 1.80x: the company spends nearly the same and sells less.

What didn't break. The balance sheet is clean and, in many ways, better than a year ago. Receivables fell 32.6% since 31.12.2025 (365.8 → 246.7 mn) on revenue down only 8.6% — a DSO of 14.8 days, among the lowest in the industry, because the model is "prepayment, except for a few large customers" (2025 Annual Report, note 22). Inventory fell …% y/y, and finished goods had already fallen 4.1% in 2025 on revenue …. Financial debt is 361.0 mn at interest rates of 0.85%…, and cash plus liquid investments (686.0 + 5.0 + 146.9 = 837.9 mn) exceed bank debt by 476.9 mn. H1 2026 operating cash flow was 312.5 mn — 2.5x accounting profit.

Estimated value. I triangulated five models on an owner-earnings base of 500 mn CNY (normalized FCFE to the parent company's shareholders — see the valuation chapter for the full bridge). The margin-of-safety range spans from (bear: flows 380 mn, zero growth, r 12%) to (bull: 650 mn, 8% growth, r 10%), with the five-model median at . A Monte Carlo simulation over 20,000 scenarios gives a median intrinsic value of HKD … (median MOS …) and a probability of undervaluation of only …%.

Verdict: WATCH, DON'T BUY YET. The price has fallen 77%, but value has fallen too. At 11.5x TTM profit and 0.88x sales (enterprise value), the stock is no longer expensive — but it also doesn't offer the margin of safety a case demands where 70.8% of revenue comes from a brand in 20% decline and 94.1% of sales from a single channel type. What would change the verdict, in order of probability: (1) proof in the H2 2026 results (March 2027) that KANS has stabilized — management claims a gradual recovery since July 2026, but the claim isn't yet verifiable; (2) a price below ~HKD 17, where even the DCF's bear scenario becomes tolerable; (3) an aggressive H-share buyback — the mandate has been approved since 8 May 2026 and hasn't been used for a single day.

The analysis's biggest surprise: the company valued its own growth subsidiary (Shanghai Yiye / newpage) at 1.82x sales via an independent appraiser in August 2026, while the market values the entire parent group at 0.88x sales. Chicmax is buying at double the multiple it itself trades at — and yet isn't buying its own stock.


Figures were removed from this excerpt. The full report opens free for five tickers a week — see what's open now.

Full report contents

  1. Executive summary
  2. 🔒 The business and the moat (Available in the full report)
  3. 🔒 Management and capital allocation (Available in the full report)
  4. 🔒 What changed in the last 4 quarters (Available in the full report)
  5. 🔒 Balance sheet analysis — Quality of Earnings (Thornton O'Glove method) (Available in the full report)
  6. 🔒 CEO profile — Outsider traits (William Thorndike method) (Available in the full report)
  7. 🔒 Accounting red flags (Available in the full report)
  8. 🔒 Triangulated valuation (Available in the full report)
  9. 🔒 Pre-mortem (Available in the full report)
  10. 🔒 Verdict compared to the tracker's GBL score (Available in the full report)

Evaluation history

DateVerdict
2026-08-23Monitor
2026-08-28Monitor
2026-09-06Monitor

Want the rest of this report?

Subscribe to get one full deep report a week by email, the day before it opens on the site.