New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) · Financial Services
Artisan Partners Asset Management Inc APAM
MonitorScore band: 50–60
Scored as a financial: return on invested capital has no meaning for a bank or an insurer, so that criterion is removed from both the score and the maximum.
The thesis, in one sentence
Administrator activ de … USD AUM care distribuie… din castiguri (randament…) dar pierde organic 7… din active pe an, cu… din AUM in doua echipe de valoare internationala; la … DCF-ul median da … MOS si Monte Carlo… probabilitate de subevaluare, deci pretul este valoarea.
Figures removed from the free version.
Key risks
- Bilantul ramane nelevierat, deci scenariul advers e o scadere de valoare, nu un risc de solvabilitate: nu exista…
What would change the verdict
- crestere venit yoy falls below -5% for 1 consecutive quarter
- marja neta falls below 18% for 2 consecutive quarters
- pe rises above 14
- actiuni rises above 88,000,000
Read it yourself
Step five of the method is the reader's: open the latest annual or quarterly report and read it before acting on anything here. A score is a summary, and a summary is not understanding.
Next report expected 2026-10-27. The deep report was written against the filings available on 2026-09-18; anything published since is not in it.
Price, one year
DCF valuation range
range of the DCF modelsbase casetoday's price
Valuation range, shape only. Figures in the full version.
Monte Carlo outcome shape
scenarios below today's pricescenarios above today's pricetoday's price
Distribution of simulated outcomes around today's price. Bar heights only; the scale and the percentiles are in the full version.
Where the money goes
Last four reported quarters, 2025-09 → 2026-06, in USD. Filings data as gathered on 2026-09-18. Figures rounded to three significant digits.
Chapter one: Executive summary (1 page: thesis, estimated value, verdict)
Deep-value: APAM — Artisan Partners Asset Management Inc. (NYSE)
Analysis 2026-09-18 · reference price … · primary sources: 10-K FY2025 (filed 2026-02-20), 10-Q Q1–Q3 2025, XBRL companyfacts via the 2026-09-18 data pack, research brief from 2026-09-18.
Executive summary (1 page: thesis, estimated value, verdict)
Artisan Partners is an active-management shop with … AUM (August 2026), built as a federation of 12 autonomous investment franchises, which earns a weighted-average fee of ~68 basis points and distributes almost all of what it earns. In 2025 it produced … of revenue, … of adjusted operating profit (35.3% margin) and … of adjusted net income, of which it distributed ~… to all economic holders — a ~98% payout ratio. It isn't a company that compounds capital; it's a pipe with a toll.
The thesis, in one sentence: at … you're paying roughly the intrinsic value of a pipe with a 9.5% dividend yield, whose flow is a direct function of the level of world stock markets (beta 1.66) and which organically loses 7… of assets a year; you win if markets rise, you lose twice over if they don't.
The correction that changes everything. The market cap that yfinance and the tracker use — … on 70.9 mil. shares — is wrong. APAM is an "Up-C" structure: alongside the 70,530,755 Class A shares, there are 10,055,405 Artisan Partners Holdings partnership units held by employee-partners and former partners (mirrored by 1,137,929 Class B shares and 8,917,476 Class C shares, with no economic rights at the APAM Inc. level but with pro-rata participation in Holdings distributions) — 10-K FY2025, cover page and balance sheet. The company itself reports 81.1 mil. "adjusted shares" (FY2025). The real economic market cap at … is therefore …, not … — 14.6% higher. Every per-share yield in the tracker (FCF yield 10.0%, P/E 8.72) is ~13% too favorable.
The earnings figure. Over the last four reported quarters (Q3 2025 – Q2 2026), adjusted net income per adjusted share is 1.02 + 1.26 + 0.87 + 0.94 = …, i.e. ~… After the ~… Global Value rebalancing expected in September 2026 and the liquidation of the U.S. Value line, the prospective normalized base is ~… — the figure I used as owner earnings. It isn't a margin × revenue estimate: it's confirmed by three independent paths (the cash bridge from the statement of cash flows, the company's own definition of "cash generated," and the actual cash amount distributed), all of which fall in the …–333 mil. range.
The estimated value. Triangulation across five models (DCF FCFE bear/base/bull, EPV Greenwald, Graham Number) gives an MOS range of ** … … … (median) … …. Monte Carlo over 20,000 scenarios on the same assumptions (OE 320, g1 1%, r …%, gt 0%, net debt 0, 81.3 mil. shares) gives a median intrinsic value of … versus a price of … — median MOS ** …, undervaluation probability ** …**, probability of a margin of safety above 30% only …%. In other words: at today's price it's a coin flip.
Verdict: MONITOR — don't buy at … Not because the business is bad (the 35.3% adjusted margin, the 0.4× leverage, and the 60.3× interest coverage are excellent), but because the price offers no margin. Expected total return ≈ dividend yield (9.5%) + growth (≈0%) ≈ 9.5%, i.e. below the …% cost of equity that a beta of 1.66 demands. The price that would give a 25% margin of safety versus the base DCF (…) is …–29 — a level last touched in March 2023 (24.14) and October 2022 (20.63). RSI 14 at 27.5 and the position below EMA50 and EMA200 say the market is already reacting to the September 10, 2026 rebalancing news; the drop from 42.57 (August) to … (September), … in a month, is exactly that message. It isn't enough yet.
The risk that could invalidate even the neutral scenario: 50.7% of AUM (54.0 bn Int'l Value Group + 37.3 bn Global Value) sits in two international value teams that just had an exceptional cycle (… and … investment return on average assets in 2025, respectively). In a model explicitly built as a "house for investment talent," with autonomous franchises and franchise capital invested in their own strategies, half the firm has legs.
Figures were removed from this excerpt. The full report opens free for five tickers a week — see what's open now.
Full report contents
- Executive summary (1 page: thesis, estimated value, verdict)
- 🔒 The business and the moat (how it makes money, competitive advantage, durability) (Available in the full report)
- 🔒 Management and capital allocation (track record, buybacks/dividends/acquisitions, skin in the game) (Available in the full report)
- 🔒 What has changed in the last 4 quarters (line-by-line balance sheet from the data pack, margins, cash conversion — explains EVERY large swing) (Available in the full report)
- 🔒 Balance-sheet analysis — Quality of Earnings (Thornton O'Glove method) (Available in the full report)
- 🔒 CEO profile — Outsider traits (William Thorndike method) (Available in the full report)
- 🔒 Accounting red flags (accruals, dilution, one-offs, accounting-policy changes) (Available in the full report)
- 🔒 Triangulated valuation (conservative DCF with explicit assumptions + earnings power value + 5-year historical multiples + Monte Carlo from step 5; a range, not a point) (Available in the full report)
- 🔒 Pre-mortem (why the thesis could be wrong — 3 concrete scenarios) (Available in the full report)
- 🔒 Verdict compared to the tracker's GBL score (convergence/divergence and why) (Available in the full report)
Evaluation history
| Date | Verdict |
|---|---|
| 2026-09-16 | Monitor |
| 2026-09-18 | Monitor |
Want the rest of this report?
Subscribe to get one full deep report a week by email, the day before it opens on the site.